First Circuit· 9/14/1998
United States v. Conley
Citations
- 156 F.3d 78
- 1998 WL 568599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing a question about ownership of money found in a defendant’s wallet as an “informational inquiry incident to the arrest, as opposed to a query designed to induce an inculpatory remark”
- where defendant asked postal inspectors to tell him what evidence they had against him, statements blurted out by defendant during recitation of evidence not the product of interrogation
- no interrogation where police responded after suspect repeatedly asked, \What’s this all about?\
- asking \what's this all about?\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Wellford, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. TeeterFirst Circuit· 2001-07-23· cited 357×
- United States v. HughesFirst Circuit· 2011-04-08· cited 151×
- United States v. AppersonTenth Circuit· 2006-03-28· cited 137×
- United States v. BaltasFirst Circuit· 2001-01-02· cited 115×
- Bui v. DiPaoloFirst Circuit· 1999-03-15· cited 101×
- United States v. Morales-MachucaFirst Circuit· 2008-10-17· cited 95×
- Carr v. PMS Fishing Corp.First Circuit· 1999-08-30· cited 90×
- United States v. SantosFirst Circuit· 2004-02-12· cited 72×
- People v. RivasSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-10-23· cited 56×
- United States v. Rivera MaldonadoFirst Circuit· 1999-10-20· cited 55×
- United States v. EirbyFirst Circuit· 2001-08-29· cited 55×
- United States v. OrrEighth Circuit· 2011-03-03· cited 52×
- United States v. Acosta-ColónFirst Circuit· 2013-12-18· cited 52×
- United States v. Gary Lee WipfEighth Circuit· 2005-02-16· cited 45×
- United States v. GenaoFirst Circuit· 2002-02-27· cited 44×
- United States v. MayFirst Circuit· 2003-09-04· cited 43×
- United States v. LopezFirst Circuit· 2004-08-19· cited 42×
- United States v. Stacy L. BriggsSeventh Circuit· 2001-11-30· cited 39×
- United States v. BerasFirst Circuit· 1999-07-07· cited 38×
- United States v. Alan Lee AmiraultFirst Circuit· 2000-08-18· cited 32×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court· 1997-01-06· cited 1,575×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- United States v. SepulvedaFirst Circuit· 1993-12-20· cited 733×
- United States v. ZapataFirst Circuit· 1994-03-25· cited 220×
- United States v. John L. St. CyrFirst Circuit· 1992-10-15· cited 188×
- United States v. Paul J. SavoieFirst Circuit· 1993-02-08· cited 175×
- United States v. SchaeferFirst Circuit· 1996-06-25· cited 143×
- United States v. Rudolph Jackson, United States of America v. Larry George DeleveauxFourth Circuit· 1989-01-03· cited 143×
- United States v. Hector GarciaFirst Circuit· 1992-01-16· cited 136×
- United States v. GracianiFirst Circuit· 1995-07-24· cited 134×
- United States v. Lloyd C. PayneFourth Circuit· 1992-01-13· cited 98×
- United States v. MeadeFirst Circuit· 1997-04-08· cited 93×
- Clifton J. Shedelbower v. Wayne EstelleNinth Circuit· 1989-09-12· cited 73×
- Charles S. POPE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Superintendent, OSCI, Et Al., Respondents-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1996-01-04· cited 33×
- United States v. BerriosFirst Circuit· 1998-01-08· cited 31×
- United States v. Christopher Trimble, Also Known as Christopher LewisTenth Circuit· 1993-02-18· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.