· 8/29/2001
United States v. Eirby
Citations
- 262 F.3d 31
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19239
- 2001 WL 968041
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the switch did not usurp the prerogative of the grand jury”
- finding that Apprendi applies to drug quantity determinations
- finding that Apprendi applies to drug quantity determinations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.