Skip to main content
· 8/29/2001

United States v. Eirby

Citations

  • 262 F.3d 31
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19239
  • 2001 WL 968041

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the switch did not usurp the prerogative of the grand jury”
  • finding that Apprendi applies to drug quantity determinations
  • finding that Apprendi applies to drug quantity determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.