Skip to main content
· 1/4/1996

Charles S. POPE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Superintendent, OSCI, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees

Citations

  • 69 F.3d 1018

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding erroneous admission of defendant's statements in violation of Miranda harmless because statements went to guilt and defense at trial focused on defendant’s mental state
  • admission of evidence obtained in violation of Miranda subject to harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poole, Trott, King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.