· 1/4/1996
Charles S. POPE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Superintendent, OSCI, Et Al., Respondents-Appellees
Citations
- 69 F.3d 1018
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding erroneous admission of defendant's statements in violation of Miranda harmless because statements went to guilt and defense at trial focused on defendant’s mental state
- admission of evidence obtained in violation of Miranda subject to harmless error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Poole, Trott, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.