Skip to main content
· 1/13/1992

United States v. Lloyd C. Payne

Citations

  • 954 F.2d 199
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 286
  • 1992 WL 3253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that agent’s statement to defendant during post-arrest transport by the FBI informing defendant that agents had found a gun in his home after which defendant made an inculpatory remark was not an interrogation
  • holding that agent's statement to defendant during post-arrest transport by the FBI informing defendant that agents had found a gun in his home after which defendant made an inculpatory remark was not an interrogation
  • holding that “the Innis definition of interrogation is not so broad as to capture within Miranda’s reach all declaratory statements by police officer concerning the nature of the charges”
  • stating that \mere declaratory descriptions of incriminating evidence do not invariably constitute interrogation\
  • stating that “mere declaratory descriptions of incriminating evidence do not invariably constitute interrogation”
  • stating that \mere declaratory descriptions of incriminating evidence do not invariably constitute interrogation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Wilkinson, Michael, Western, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.