Radtke v. Lifecare Management Partners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the denial of a motion for judgment as a matter of law where “the parties introduced conflicting evidence regarding the appellees’ primary duties”
• trial court did not err in declining to give a “perjury instruction” after witness testified inconsistently
• \Appellants have shown at most that there was a conflict in the evidence before the jury. It is the function of the jury and not this court to weigh evidence and make findings.\
• “Appellants have shown at most that there was a conflict in the evidence before the jury. It is the function of the jury and not this court to weigh evidence and make findings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).