United States v. Padilla-Galarza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The taxpayer’s] charitable clients represented a substantial, continuing, integral part of her business. . . . [I]t would stretch credulity to characterize the payments [to them] as ‘contributions.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).