D.C. Circuit· 12/27/2013

United States v. Gerald Eiland

Citations

407 U.S. App. D.C. 349
738 F.3d 338
93 Fed. R. Serv. 257
2013 WL 6818386
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing ability of courts of appeals to direct entry of judgment for a lesser-included offense when conviction of a greater offense cannot be sustained
explaining that the placement of informants does not demonstrate lack of necessity because those informants were not close enough to the core members of the conspiracy to “have access to the most closely held secrets”
requiring “an agreement between at least two people to violate [the Controlled Substances Act]”
paraphrasing the February 13, 2004, Sparks Affidavit
finding two years satisfies the longevity requirement
paraphrasing the February 13, 2004, Sparks Affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Rogers, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.