United States v. Charles Aaron Green

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court “must make factual findings as appropriate or necessary to carry out its sentencing function”
• holding that if a “sentence is based on an error in construing or applying the Guidelines, it will be found unreasonable and vacated”
• explaining that if a “sentence is based on an error in construing or applying the Guidelines, it will be found unreasonable and vacated”
• holding that sentences within the guideline range are presumptively reasonable
• noting that district courts must “especially ex-plaint]” deviations from the Guidelines
• stating that “a sentence imposed within the properly calculated Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).