Eighth Circuit· 7/18/2008

United States v. Gray

Citations

533 F.3d 942
2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15266
2008 WL 2777408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that Rita was not an “obscure decision[ ] likely to have been overlooked by federal sentencing judges”
noting that “ ‘[cjircumstances may well make clear’ that the judge believed the ease was typical” (emphasis added
stating circumstances may make it clear “that the judge believed the case was typical, and rested his decision upon the Commission’s own reasoning”
stating that this court presumes that district judges understand their obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors, and if the district court references some § 3553(a) factors, this court is ordinarily satisfied that it was aware of them all
noting Rita was “hardly [an] obscure decision[] likely to have been overlooked by federal sentencing judges. . . .”
explaining, “not every reasonable argument advanced by a defendant requires a specific rejoinder by the judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Shepherd, Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Gray

140 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.