Supreme Court· 6/4/2007
Claiborne v. United States
Citations
- 551 U.S. 87
- 127 S. Ct. 2245
- 167 L. Ed. 2d 1080
- 2007 U.S. LEXIS 6964
- 75 U.S.L.W. 4397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an “individual judge who imposes a sentence within the range recommended by the Guidelines thus makes a decision that is fully consistent with the Commission’s judgment in general”
- per curiam opinion vacating circuit court judgment as moot due to death of petitioner
- “[Wlhen ruling on a defendant’s motion to dismiss, a judge must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint.” (citing Bell Atl, Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 (2007) (citing Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 508 n.1 (2002)))
- “[W]hen ruling on a defendant’s motion to dismiss, a judge must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint.” (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 (2007) (citing Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 508 n.1 (2002)))
- “[W]hen ruling on a defendant’s motion to dismiss, a judge must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint.” (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 (2007) (citing Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 508 n.1 (2002)))
- “[W]hen ruling on a defendant’s motion to dismiss, a judge must accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint.” (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 (2007) (citing Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 508 n.1 (2002)))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- United States v. CartyNinth Circuit· 2008-03-24· cited 2,478×
- United States v. Angel-GuzmanTenth Circuit· 2007-10-30· cited 50×
- United States v. SmithEighth Circuit· 2009-07-28· cited 37×
- United States v. LeeEighth Circuit· 2009-01-09· cited 31×
- United States v. RussellFirst Circuit· 2008-08-06· cited 14×
- United States v. GillmoreEighth Circuit· 2007-08-15· cited 8×
- Suntharalinkam v. KeislerNinth Circuit· 2007-10-31· cited 7×
- United States v. Marron-GarciaEighth Circuit· 2009-02-26· cited 6×
- United States v. TaffereD. Maine· 2007-11-08
- United States v. Carol L. GillmoreEighth Circuit· 2007-08-15
- United States v. Russell LeeEighth Circuit· 2009-01-09
- United States v. David Marron-GarciaEighth Circuit· 2009-02-26
- United States v. Christopher SmithEighth Circuit· 2009-07-28
- Suntharalinkam v. KeislerNinth Circuit· 2007-10-17
- Suntharalinkam v. KeislerNinth Circuit· 2007-10-30
- Beres v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-04-16
- Gilliard v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-10-28
- Tapia v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-12-16
- United States v. Perez-MoralesNinth Circuit· 2008-07-28
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Claiborne v. United States
11 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Claiborne v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1935-05-03· cited 24×
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 2×
- Claiborne v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 2006-02-13· cited 1×
- Claiborne v. United StatesW.D. Kentucky· 1978-02-23
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-10-01
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-05-26
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-25
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-25
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-12-16
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-01-08
- Claiborne v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-03-14
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.