United States v. Kristl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the Supreme Court “excised” section § 3742(2) and that the “proper standard of review for sentences imposed post-Booker is reasonableness.”
• explaining that we remand for re-sentencing when the district court makes a non-harmless error in applying the guidelines
• recognizing that courts must consider the Guidelines
• noting we review questions of law regarding application of the Guidelines de novo
• “First, we must determine whether the district court considered the applicable Guidelines range.”
• “[T]he purpose of the Guidelines [is] to promote uniformity in sentencing so as to prevent vastly divergent sentences for offenders with similar criminal histories and offenses.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).