Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 12/30/2005

United States v. Blaine Travis Fifield

Citations

  • 432 F.3d 1056
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 29011
  • 2005 WL 3556912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the imposition of consecutive sentences con- trary to § 5G1.3(b)(2), when applicable, is a deviation from the Guidelines
  • explaining that the imposition of consecutive sentences con- trary to § 5G1.3(b)(2), when applicable, is a deviation from the Guidelines
  • Apprendi right to jury finding is not implicated in decision whether to cumulate sentences because that decision is discretionary, not fact-bound
  • the district court need not specifically articulate reasons for its choice between a concurrent and a consecutive sentence
  • applying the § 3553(c) requirement post-Booker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gould, Berzon, Schwarzer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Blaine Travis Fifield

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.