United States v. Blaine Travis Fifield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the imposition of consecutive sentences con- trary to § 5G1.3(b)(2), when applicable, is a deviation from the Guidelines
• explaining that the imposition of consecutive sentences con- trary to § 5G1.3(b)(2), when applicable, is a deviation from the Guidelines
• Apprendi right to jury finding is not implicated in decision whether to cumulate sentences because that decision is discretionary, not fact-bound
• the district court need not specifically articulate reasons for its choice between a concurrent and a consecutive sentence
• applying the § 3553(c) requirement post-Booker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).