Skip to main content
· 12/19/1991

United States v. Horst Werner Joetzki, United States of America v. Lawrence Carl Gisner

Citations

  • 952 F.2d 1090
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 15642
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 611
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 29415
  • 1991 WL 268463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for resentencing on multiple counts when the district court had imposed a sentence exceeding that of the count carrying the highest statutory maximum and failed to clarify whether the sentences were to run consecutively or concurrently
  • remanding for resentencing on multiple counts when the district court had imposed a sentence exceeding that of the count carrying the highest statutory maximum and failed to clarify whether the sentences were to run consecutively or concurrently
  • “ ‘adjustments’ and ‘departures’ are distinctly different concepts under the Guidelines. Adjustments are changes to an offense level within the Guidelines. Departures, on the other hand, are sentences imposed outside the Guidelines”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Boochever, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.