United States v. Jawad Miqbel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court may not consider at a revocation sentencing any § 3553(a) factor omitted from § 3583(e)
• holding that a revocation sentence may be imposed as a sanction for the defendant’s breach of the court’s trust
• holding that “mere reference” to unenumerated § 3553(a)(2)(A) factors would not be reversible error, but that further consideration of such factors when revoking supervised release is procedurally unreasonable
• holding that § 3553(c)(2) applies to sentencing for violation of supervised release conditions
• stating that the district court was required to explain both “the specific reasons why a [sentence within the Guidelines range] would not be sufficient and why [the sentence imposed, which fell outside the range,] was appropriate”
• holding that failure to comply with § 3553(c)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).