Skip to main content
· 1/12/1988

United States v. Richard Ralph Bergmann, Jr.

Citations

  • 836 F.2d 1220
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 225
  • 1988 WL 884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in cases of direct conflict between a court’s oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment, the oral pronounce- ment controls
  • applying the clear-error standard to determine whether the clerk had erred in describing the sentence and applying de novo review over legal questions
  • \we are not persuaded that the court's persistent misperception of applicable law did not distort its view of the evidence the parties adduced.\
  • applying the clear error standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Alarcon, Poole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.