Tennessee Supreme Court· 6/24/2008

State v. Allen

Citations

259 S.W.3d 671
2008 Tenn. LEXIS 419
2008 WL 2497001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that Blakely does not require a jury to determine the manner in which a defendant serves multiple sentences
holding that a defendant “is entitled to concurrent sentences on multiple convictions unless the trial court makes specific factual findings by a preponderance of the evidence after conviction, or consecutive sentences are required by statute or a rule of criminal procedure.”
ruling Sixth Amendment challenges inapt to Tennessee’s consecutive sentencing statute
ruling Sixth Amendment Blakely challenges inapplicable to consecutive sentencing
ruling Sixth Amendment Blakely challenges inapplicable to consecutive sentencing
ruling Sixth Amendment Blakely challenges inapplicable to consecutive sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Justice Cornelia A. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.