United States v. Roosevelt Anderson, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “a person is guilty of criminal copyright infringement if he or she ‘willfully’ infringes a copyright for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain”
• “An objection to an instruction on a different ground is not sufficient to preserve de novo review.”
• “[A] defendant’s mere proposal of an alternate instruction does not satisfy Rule 30’s standard of specificity.”
• “Other act evidence that is inextricably intertwined with a charged offense is independently admissible.” (citation modified)
• Guidelines § 2B5.3(b)(1) loss of at least $200,000; restitution of $247,144
• “Other act evidence that is inextricably intertwined with a charged offense is independently admissible and is exempt from the requirements of Rule 1 Because the government does not contend that Hull’s post-trial Franks motion was untimely, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).