United States v. Carmella Dawson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “were Dawson's co-schemers to pay Rush Hospital any amounts in restitution, we expect that the government would notify Dawson of that occurrence so that she could properly file a request for modification of restitution”
• “were Dawson's co-schemers to pay Rush Hospital any amounts in restitution, we expect that the government would notify Dawson of that occurrence so that she could properly file a request for modification of restitution”
• “were Dawson's co-schemers to pay Rush Hospital any amounts in restitution, we expect that the government would notify Dawson of that occurrence so that she could properly file a request for modification of restitution”
• “were Dawson's co-schemers to pay Rush Hospital any amounts in restitution, we expect that the government would notify Dawson of that occurrence so that she could properly file a request for modification of restitution”
• “[W]ere [the defendant’s] co-schemers to pay [the victim] any amounts in restitution, we expect that the government would notify [the defendant] of that occurrence so that [he] could properly file a request for modification of restitution. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664(j)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).