United States v. Devon Roche

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly estimated drug weight based on the actual weight of recovered ecstasy tablets because “the defendant is responsible for the weight of the whole pill, not just the active ingredient”
• noting that “the relevant provision at sen‐ tencing is the due process clause, not the confrontation clause,” which does not require cross‐examination of a declarant
• noting that “the relevant provision at sen‐ tencing is the due process clause, not the confrontation clause,” which does not require cross‐examination of a declarant
• noting that “the relevant provision at sen‐ tencing is the due process clause, not the confrontation clause,” which does not require cross‐examination of a declarant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).