Skip to main content
· 7/8/2005

United States v. Luciano

Citations

  • 414 F.3d 174
  • 67 Fed. R. Serv. 839
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13574
  • 2005 WL 1594576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that out- of-court statements employed at sentencing had indicia of reliability of excited utterances under Fed. R. Evid. 803(2)
  • “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
  • “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
  • “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no . . . Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
  • “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
  • “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.