· 7/8/2005
United States v. Luciano
Citations
- 414 F.3d 174
- 67 Fed. R. Serv. 839
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13574
- 2005 WL 1594576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that out- of-court statements employed at sentencing had indicia of reliability of excited utterances under Fed. R. Evid. 803(2)
- “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
- “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
- “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no . . . Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
- “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
- “Nothing in Crawford requires us to alter our previous conclusion that there is no Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right at sentencing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Torruella, Lipez, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.