United States v. Clemente Ramon Rodriguez, Erasmo Gonzalez, Jose M. Barroso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that conduct illustrating remorse for the purpose of mitigation may take 23 place “prior to, during, and after the trial”
• vacating sentences when the trial court “balanced the Appellants’ statements of remorse against their refusal to admit their guilt in open court and their intent to appeal their sentences”
• “The sentencing court is justified in considering the defendant’s conduct prior to, during, and after the trial to determine if the defendant has shown any remorse through his actions or statements.”
• “The sentencing court is justified in considering the defendant’s conduct prior to, during, and after the trial to determine if the defendant has shown any remorse through his actions or statements.”
• involving U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 reduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).