Skip to main content
· 2/8/1982

United States v. Donald Gene Booth

Citations

  • 669 F.2d 1231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that questions relating to defendant’s identity and age were not likely to elicit an incriminating response
  • holding that the test for determining whether questioning constitutes “interrogation” should be analyzed under a totality of the circumstances standard
  • holding that questions relating to a defendant’s identity and age were not likely to elicit an incriminating response
  • concluding that questions relating to defendant’s identity and age were not likely to elicit an incriminating response
  • holding that the test for determining whether questioning constitutes “interroga- tion” should be analyzed under a totality of the circumstances standard
  • holding that asking a suspect his name, age, and address were not interrogation but that asking for his prior arrest record and his reasons for being in the area were

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmieri, Tang, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.