· 2/8/1982
United States v. Donald Gene Booth
Citations
- 669 F.2d 1231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that questions relating to defendant’s identity and age were not likely to elicit an incriminating response
- holding that the test for determining whether questioning constitutes “interrogation” should be analyzed under a totality of the circumstances standard
- holding that questions relating to a defendant’s identity and age were not likely to elicit an incriminating response
- concluding that questions relating to defendant’s identity and age were not likely to elicit an incriminating response
- holding that the test for determining whether questioning constitutes “interroga- tion” should be analyzed under a totality of the circumstances standard
- holding that asking a suspect his name, age, and address were not interrogation but that asking for his prior arrest record and his reasons for being in the area were
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Palmieri, Tang, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.