· 6/3/2004
Ture v. State
Citations
- 681 N.W.2d 9
- 2004 Minn. LEXIS 312
- 2004 WL 1211624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the use of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ during closing argument . . . was an improper interjection of personal opinion into the argument”
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
- rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.