Skip to main content
· 6/3/2004

Ture v. State

Citations

  • 681 N.W.2d 9
  • 2004 Minn. LEXIS 312
  • 2004 WL 1211624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the use of the first-person pronoun ‘I’ during closing argument . . . was an improper interjection of personal opinion into the argument”
  • rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
  • rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
  • rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
  • rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument
  • rejecting pro se arguments without detailing consideration of each argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.