Skip to main content

State v. Morton

Citations

  • 701 N.W.2d 225
  • 2005 Minn. LEXIS 468
  • 2005 WL 1836935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “grisly” photos were relevant to show elements of first-degree and second-degree murder and admissible where medical examiner testified to cause of death and probable killing during sexual assault
  • holding that “grisly” photos were relevant to show elements of first-degree and second- degree murder and admissible when medical examiner testified to cause of death and probable killing during sexual assault
  • holding that the use of “were they lying” questions was improper because “the state shifted the jury's focus by creating the impression that the jury must conclude that these two witnesses were lying in order to acquit Morton”
  • explaining that the prosecutor improperly asked whether earlier witnesses were not telling the truth
  • applying plain-error review when a defendant fails to request curative instructions
  • improper to cross-examine defendant with “were they lying” questions where it could lead jury to believe they must think witnesses were lying in 3 order to acquit defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.