TRM, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the provision of a de novo hearing in the district court adequately protects an aggrieved store owner’s procedural due process rights”
• “We conclude that Congress would not have provided a [CMP] as an alternative to permanent disqualification for innocent owners had it not felt that innocent owners could be disqualified under the Food Stamp Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).