Skip to main content
· 3/6/1975

E. R. Redmond D/B/A Arcola Food Market v. United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture

Citations

  • 507 F.2d 1007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ultimately, after a de novo trial with findings of fact, “unless proven to be invalid, the agency action prevails”
  • “[T]he burden of proof . . . is upon the aggrieved food store to establish the invalidity of the administrative action in issue by the preponderance of the evidence.”
  • “By providing the aggrieved food store with a new trial where the store may introduce evidence outside the administrative record, the statute also protects the rights and interests of the store against final adverse action without the opportunity for an adversary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roney, Coleman, Clark, Ro-Ney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.