· 3/6/1975
E. R. Redmond D/B/A Arcola Food Market v. United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture
Citations
- 507 F.2d 1007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ultimately, after a de novo trial with findings of fact, “unless proven to be invalid, the agency action prevails”
- “[T]he burden of proof . . . is upon the aggrieved food store to establish the invalidity of the administrative action in issue by the preponderance of the evidence.”
- “By providing the aggrieved food store with a new trial where the store may introduce evidence outside the administrative record, the statute also protects the rights and interests of the store against final adverse action without the opportunity for an adversary hearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roney, Coleman, Clark, Ro-Ney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.