Georgia Manufactured Housing Ass'n v. Spalding County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a zoning requirement [as to roof pitch] related to aesthetics is not preempted [by NMHCSSA] because the goals and effects of such a standard have nothing to do with consumer protection .... ” (emphasis added)
• finding that “laws that impose the same burden on in-state and out-of-state business interest usually do not violate the Commerce Clause.”
• construction requirement that would increase costs for the industry and consumers of manufactured housing does not demonstrate impermissible burden on interstate commerce “because price increases generally do not violate the dormant Commerce Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).