Skip to main content
· 5/6/1997

Evanston Insurance v. Stonewall Surplus Lines Insurance

Citations

  • 111 F.3d 852
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9985
  • 1997 WL 191804

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]his issue concerns ‘what [the insured] knew, and when it knew it.’ [The insured’s] actions can be properly evaluated only in this context. We do not ask whether [the insured’s] evaluation of the case was ‘correct’ or ‘mistaken’ but whether, at the time, it was based upon reason.”
  • applying Georgia and Wisconsin law
  • applying Georgia and Wisconsin law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Hill, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.