In the Matter of Farouk Ibrahim, D/B/A Onondaga Circle Market v. United States of America, Acting Through the Department of Agriculture

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that district courts \should not limit [their] consideration to matters previously appraised in the administrative proceedings\
• “trial de novo provision clearly afforded full procedural due process”
• “[T]he Food Stamp Act requires the district court to reexamine the [A]gency’s decision on a fresh record, rather than determining whether the administrative decision was supported by substantial evidence. . . . [S]uch review afford[s] appellant due process.”
• \The trial de novo provision clearly afforded full procedural due process\
• “The trial de novo provision clearly afforded full procedural due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).