Bakal Brothers, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an innocent owner could be permanently disqualified from the program
• holding the store was “responsible for the conduct of all employees who work where food stamps are accepted” under applicable regulations and the statute
• “a store is responsible for illegal trafficking by employees even if there is evidence that neither the owner nor manager of the store ‘was aware of, approved, benefitted from, or was involved in the conduct or approval of the violation.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).