Tenth Circuit· 4/4/2006
Toomer v. City Cab
Citations
- 443 F.3d 1191
- 17 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1360
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 8079
- 12 Accom. Disabilities Dec. (CCH) 12
- 2006 WL 856222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When construing a statute, we should give effect, if possible, to every clause and word.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, McKAY, O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Fish v. KobachTenth Circuit· 2016-10-19· cited 243×
- United States v. LamirandTenth Circuit· 2012-01-05· cited 74×
- Navajo Nation v. DalleyTenth Circuit· 2018-07-24· cited 40×
- United States v. SprengerTenth Circuit· 2010-11-22· cited 27×
- Hackwell v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2007-07-05· cited 26×
- Newton v. Federal Aviation AdministrationTenth Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 16×
- USA Tax Law Center, Inc. v. Office Warehouse Wholesale, LLCColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-04-19· cited 16×
- United States v. TheisTenth Circuit· 2017-04-11· cited 14×
- United States v. CollinsTenth Circuit· 2017-02-14· cited 13×
- Access Living of Metro. Chi. v. Uber Techs., Inc.E.D. Illinois· 2018-12-17· cited 13×
- Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. SebeliusTenth Circuit· 2011-09-19· cited 7×
- American Aerial Services, Inc. v. Terex USA, LLCD. Maine· 2014-08-15· cited 6×
- Dalzell v. RP Steamboat Springs, LLCTenth Circuit· 2015-03-24· cited 4×
- In RE QuVIS, INC.D. Kansas· 2012-03-13· cited 2×
- Friesen v. Seacoast Capital Partners II, L.P. (In re QuVis, Inc.)D. Kansas· 2012-03-13· cited 1×
- United States v. NipperD. New Mexico· 2012-08-03· cited 1×
- United States v. CollinsTenth Circuit· 2017-04-07
- Cupps v. Pioneer Canal-LakeTenth Circuit· 2020-04-10
- Tribe v. SebeliusTenth Circuit· 2011-09-19
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 2,368×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 1,468×
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court· 2002-02-19· cited 1,044×
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court· 2006-01-17· cited 632×
- Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court· 1966-03-23· cited 477×
- General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. ClineSupreme Court· 2004-02-24· cited 412×
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 408×
- Chickasaw Nation v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 405×
- Pippin v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.Tenth Circuit· 2006-02-14· cited 135×
- Anderson v. United States Department of LaborTenth Circuit· 2005-09-02· cited 108×
- Edwards v. ValdezTenth Circuit· 1986-05-05· cited 94×
- Ralph Robbins v. Larry Chronister, in His Personal and Official Capacity, United States of America, IntervenorTenth Circuit· 2006-01-25· cited 68×
- Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming CommissionTenth Circuit· 2003-04-17· cited 61×
- Harbert v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2004-12-13· cited 47×
- Hain v. MullinTenth Circuit· 2006-01-23· cited 27×
- Liane B. Foutz v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1995-12-18· cited 27×
- Keirnan v. Utah Transit AuthorityTenth Circuit· 2003-08-12· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.