Seneca-Cayuga Tribe v. National Indian Gaming Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining “no deference” owed to National Indian Gaming Commission’s construction of Johnson Act because United States Department of Justice, rather than NIGC, is charged with administering statute
• determining \no deference\ owed to National Indian Gaming Commission's construction of Johnson Act because United States Department of Justice, rather than NIGC, is charged with administering statute
• “[T]hrough IGRA, Congress spoke specifically to the federal government’s regulatory scheme over certain forms of authorized gambling within Indian country.”
• “[T]hrough IGRA, Congress spoke specifically to the federal government’s regulatory scheme over certain forms of authorized gambling within Indian country.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).