Skip to main content
· 8/8/2006

Newton v. Federal Aviation Administration

Citations

  • 457 F.3d 1133
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 20268
  • 2006 WL 2259407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, insofar as an agency handbook is interpreting the statute “it is entitled to deference to the extent it is persuasive, and it is entitled to great deference insofar as it is interpreting the agency’s own regulations” (citations omitted)
  • stating that an agency handbook is entitled to “great deference insofar as it is interpreting the agency’s own regulations”
  • Docket No. 49, Ex. 2, Attach. 14

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Seymour, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.