Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 5/5/1986

Edwards v. Valdez

Citations

  • 789 F.2d 1477
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[s]uspect classifications generally include those based on race, alienage, and national origin”
  • observing that “[s]uspect classifications generally include those based on race, alienage, and national origin”
  • “When the meaning of a statute is clear, it is both unnecessary and improper to resort to legislative history to divine congressional intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baldock, Seymour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Edwards v. Valdez

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.