Tenth Circuit· 5/5/1986
Edwards v. Valdez
Citations
- 789 F.2d 1477
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 24814
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “[s]uspect classifications generally include those based on race, alienage, and national origin”
- observing that “[s]uspect classifications generally include those based on race, alienage, and national origin”
- “When the meaning of a statute is clear, it is both unnecessary and improper to resort to legislative history to divine congressional intent”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baldock, Seymour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-02-14· cited 120×
- Talley v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1992-04-06· cited 63×
- Dutcher v. MathesonTenth Circuit· 2016-11-02· cited 60×
- United States v. Phillip Rae MorganTenth Circuit· 1991-01-10· cited 56×
- City of Ouray v. OlinSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-09-19· cited 54×
- Donald Stephens, and v. John Thomas, Warden, and Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1994-04-13· cited 52×
- Ewing v. RodgersTenth Circuit· 1987-08-19· cited 42×
- United States v. ManningTenth Circuit· 2008-05-16· cited 41×
- Navajo Nation v. DalleyTenth Circuit· 2018-07-24· cited 40×
- St. Charles Investment Co. v. CommissionerTenth Circuit· 2000-11-14· cited 39×
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. CuomoN.D. New York· 1987-08-04· cited 36×
- Levorsen v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2016-07-12· cited 34×
- United States v. OrtizTenth Circuit· 2005-11-01· cited 31×
- Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionTenth Circuit· 1987-09-22· cited 28×
- Hain v. MullinTenth Circuit· 2006-01-23· cited 27×
- In Re SpadeD. Colorado· 2001-01-22· cited 24×
- Toomer v. City CabTenth Circuit· 2006-04-04· cited 23×
- Unnamed caseTenth Circuit· 1988-01-11· cited 23×
- Clifford R. Pigg, and Stephen G. Glover v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationTenth Circuit· 1997-01-13· cited 21×
- Kelley v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 2004-12-30· cited 21×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 8,956×
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 4,123×
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court· 1982-09-09· cited 2,739×
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 2,156×
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1911-03-20· cited 1,717×
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court· 1945-01-08· cited 1,526×
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 1,058×
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court· 1985-04-01· cited 836×
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 721×
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 658×
- Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 621×
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 555×
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court· 1949-05-31· cited 508×
- Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1942-04-06· cited 494×
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 398×
- Metropolis Theater Company, Plffs. In Err. v. City of Chicago and Ernest J. MagerstadtSupreme Court· 1913-04-07· cited 328×
Other cases named Edwards v. Valdez
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.