United States v. Lamirand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 1994 amendment changed “the reference point for determining the maximum post[]revocation terms of imprisonment” from “the originally imposed supervised- released term” to “the statute authorizing supervised-release terms”
• refusing to “definitively opine on the merits” where a defendant “has not asked us to review his late-blooming argument for plain error”
• “[T]he failure to argue for plain error and its application on appeal . . . surely marks the end of the road for an argument for reversal not first presented to the district court . . . .” (first omission in original) (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).