Fifth Circuit· 9/1/2006

Tittle v. Enron Corp.

Citations

463 F.3d 410
2006 WL 2522444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that when a disinterested party is “relieved . . . the persons between whom the dispute really exists shall fight it out at their own expense” (quoting Wright, et al., Fed. Prac. & Proc. § 1702 (3d ed. 2001)
determining scope of arbitration clause only because there was no dispute that the parties were subject to a valid arbitration agreement
determining scope of arbitration clause only because there was no dispute that the parties were subject to a valid arbitration agreement
“[T]he scope of the Arbitration Clause is limited only to disputes, arising out of or related to the policies, that include an Insurer and one or more insureds.”
“[A] court must determine whether the parties agreed to arbitrate the dispute in question.”
“The’ legislative purpose of an interpleader action is to remedy the problems posed by multiple claimants to a single fund, and to protect a stakeholder from the possibility of multiple claims on a single fund.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dennis, King, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Tittle v. Enron Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.