Skip to main content
· 7/26/1996

Webb v. Investacorp, Inc.

Citations

  • 89 F.3d 252
  • 30 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 756
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18731
  • 1996 WL 388449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the amount in controversy in Federal Arbitration Act action is amount in dispute in underlying arbitration proceeding
  • holding that when considering a suit seeking to enjoin arbitration, it was proper to look at “the underlying arbitration to determine the amount in controversy in this action for declaratory relief”
  • specifying that a company had a “debit balance of [] $75,000” and contended that its adversary was “contractually obligated to indemnify it for [that] loss”
  • deciding, to leave unresolved the ques tion of which state’s laws applied because regardless of which law applied, the plaintiffs arguments concerning the validity of the agreement were without merit
  • stating that this court usually will not review a matter that was not first presented to the district court and that issues not raised and argued in the initial brief on appeal are waived
  • upholding an arbitration provision that called for the Texas-based plaintiff to proceed with arbitration in the county where the Florida defendant maintained its executive offices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Davis, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.