· 5/22/1995
First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan
Citations
- 514 U.S. 938
- 115 S. Ct. 1920
- 131 L. Ed. 2d 985
- 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a court should decide whether the arbitration contract bound parties who did not sign the agreement
- holding that a court should decide whether the arbitration contract bound parties who did not sign the agreement
- holding that, when deciding whether the parties agreed to arbitrate, \courts generally ... should apply ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts\
- holding that, when deciding whether the parties agreed to arbitrate, “courts generally ... should apply ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts”
- holding that question of whether party agreed to arbitrate was for the court to decide based on state-law principles of contract formation
- holding that arbitration award will be enforced only where the parties have agreed to submit to arbitration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breyer, Bkeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.