Skip to main content
· 5/22/1995

First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan

Citations

  • 514 U.S. 938
  • 115 S. Ct. 1920
  • 131 L. Ed. 2d 985
  • 1995 U.S. LEXIS 3463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court should decide whether the arbitration contract bound parties who did not sign the agreement
  • holding that a court should decide whether the arbitration contract bound parties who did not sign the agreement
  • holding that, when deciding whether the parties agreed to arbitrate, \courts generally ... should apply ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts\
  • holding that, when deciding whether the parties agreed to arbitrate, “courts generally ... should apply ordinary state-law principles that govern the formation of contracts”
  • holding that question of whether party agreed to arbitrate was for the court to decide based on state-law principles of contract formation
  • holding that arbitration award will be enforced only where the parties have agreed to submit to arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Bkeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.