Skip to main content
· 7/1/2005

SAS Institute, Inc. v. Breitenfeld

Citations

  • 167 S.W.3d 840
  • 48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 949
  • 2005 Tex. LEXIS 513
  • 2005 WL 1538273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that summary judgment movant must prove that no genuine issue of material fact exists to prevail on motion
  • explaining that when a written instrument is worded so that it can be given a definite meaning or interpretation, it will be interpreted as a matter of law
  • enforcing unambiguous provisions of commission contract as a matter of law on summary juidgment
  • “The intent of a contract is not changed simply because the circumstances do not precisely match the scenarios anticipated by the contract.”
  • employment agreement for sales bonus written to extend beyond the employment period
  • meaning of unambiguous contract is question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.