· 7/1/2005
SAS Institute, Inc. v. Breitenfeld
Citations
- 167 S.W.3d 840
- 48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 949
- 2005 Tex. LEXIS 513
- 2005 WL 1538273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that summary judgment movant must prove that no genuine issue of material fact exists to prevail on motion
- explaining that when a written instrument is worded so that it can be given a definite meaning or interpretation, it will be interpreted as a matter of law
- enforcing unambiguous provisions of commission contract as a matter of law on summary juidgment
- “The intent of a contract is not changed simply because the circumstances do not precisely match the scenarios anticipated by the contract.”
- employment agreement for sales bonus written to extend beyond the employment period
- meaning of unambiguous contract is question of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.