TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interpleader is also justified by “the expense of defending twice”
• explaining that citizenship of a natural person requires not only “[r]esidence in fact” but also “the purpose to make the place of residence one’s home”
• explaining that the expansion of federal juris- diction to suits “in the nature of interpleader” extends inter- pleader to plaintiffs who themselves “claim[] an interest in the property or fund which is subjected to the risk”
• explaining that the expansion of federal juris- diction to suits “in the nature of interpleader” extends inter- pleader to plaintiffs who themselves “claim[] an interest in the property or fund which is subjected to the risk”
• explaining that the expansion of federal juris- diction to suits “in the nature of interpleader” extends inter- pleader to plaintiffs who themselves “claim[] an interest in the property or fund which is subjected to the risk”
• explaining that the expansion of federal juris- diction to suits “in the nature of interpleader” extends inter- pleader to plaintiffs who themselves “claim[] an interest in the property or fund which is subjected to the risk”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).