Skip to main content

Thompson v. State

Citations

  • 615 So. 2d 737
  • 1993 WL 40431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pro se motion for discharge filed when defendant was represented by counsel is a nullity
  • finding defense question about where witness got information for arrest warrant did not open door to testimony regarding what that information was
  • “This court has frequently held that a pro se motion for discharge filed when the defendant was represented by counsel is a nullity, having no legal force or effect ”
  • “This court has frequently held that a pro se motion for discharge filed when the defendant was represented by counsel is a nullity, having no legal force or effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.