State v. Craven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that rule 3.191(a) “shall cease to apply whenever a person files a valid demand for speedy trial under subdivision (b)”
• explaining that to allow trial counsel to adopt a pro se motion to withdraw plea after the 30-day limit passes “would swallow the ‘nullity’ rule”
• holding “that in the context of pro se speedy trial pleadings, if the trial court permits defense counsel to adopt the pro se pleadings, the effective date should be the actual date of adoption, not the date on which the unauthorized pleadings were filed.”
• “In some situations, defense counsel can adopt 7 and proceed to argue his client’s pro se filings.”
• “Such pleadings are nullities without regard to whether a motion to strike was filed.”
• “Such pleadings are nullities without regard to whether a motion to strike was filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Golden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-26· cited 8×
• Cornelius v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-27· cited 5×
• State v. Templar-O'Brien
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-09-04· cited 4×
• RIGUEIRO v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-22· cited 2×
• Derrick L. Mathis, Jr. v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-06-07
• Raul A. Campoverde v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Logan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-04-17· cited 223×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-16· cited 13×
• Kidd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-03· cited 13×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-19· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-30· cited 9×
• Sams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-23· cited 6×