Rath v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once circuit court is put on notice of a discovery violation circuit court is obligated to conduct a Richardson inquiry to determine prejudicial affect, if any, of violation
• finding that the trial court erred in failing to conduct a Richardson hearing when the defendant notified the trial court of a discovery violation by objecting to the state's introduction of two undisclosed expert witnesses
• once trial court is put on notice of a discovery violation it is obligated to conduct a Richardson hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-20· cited 14×
• Sears v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-23· cited 13×
• C.D.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03· cited 13×
• Major v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-30· cited 10×
• Stimus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 7×
• Swanson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-09· cited 1×
• CDB v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-03
• Amanda K. Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
• State v. Chapman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-23· cited 52×
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-19· cited 10×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-24· cited 10×
• Webber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-12· cited 2×