Supreme Court of Florida· 11/29/1990
State v. Baird
Citations
- 572 So. 2d 904
- 1990 WL 191708
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the best practice is to allow an office to State that he or she acted upon a \tip\ or \information received\ without going into the details of the accusatory information
- holding that the best practice is to allow an office to State that he or she acted upon a \tip\ or \information received\ without going into the details of the accusatory information
- stating that such testimony is admissible to rebut a defense effort to suggest that the defendant had been improperly targeted for prosecution
- finding similar error harmless where challenged testimony was only elicited prematurely, rebutted a defense contention, and was not brought to the jury's attention again, and because State relied on properly admitted evidence
- finding inadmissible as hearsay a police officer’s testimony, during a racketeering trial, that he had received information that the defendant “was a major gambler and operating a major gambling operation”
- it was error to admit testimony relating information received from informant because the testimony was elicited before State's motive for investigating defendant was put in issue on cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ehrlich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-01-18· cited 153×
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-05· cited 99×
- Keen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 74×
- Bozeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-03· cited 66×
- Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-07· cited 63×
- Dennis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-31· cited 63×
- Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-05-20· cited 60×
- Penalver v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-02· cited 56×
- Peterka v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-04-21· cited 45×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-09-24· cited 41×
- Caruso v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-06· cited 39×
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-24· cited 39×
- Wilding v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-05-16· cited 33×
- Richard R. Mcdade v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-12-11· cited 26×
- Rafael Andres v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-09-20· cited 19×
- Fluellen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-12-23· cited 18×
- Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-09· cited 18×
- Schaffer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-18· cited 18×
- K.V. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-11· cited 15×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-13· cited 13×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 530×
- Newlon v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 261×
- Breedlove v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-03-04· cited 148×
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-03-31· cited 67×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-07· cited 40×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-19· cited 13×
- Baird v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.