United States v. Khaled Obeid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an equal protection challenge was unripe until the government breached its promise to treat the petitioner and a co- conspirator equally with respect to a motion for a sentence reduction
• In determining whether a habeas petition is 1 second or successive, Courts have distinguished between “genuinely unripe claims (where the 2 factual predicate that gives rise to the claim has not yet occurred
• “[A] petition or motion based on a claim that did not become ripe any earlier than until after the adjudication of the petitioner’s first petition or motion is not ‘second or successive’ within the meaning of Sections 2244 and 2255(h).”
• \a petition or motion based on a claim that did not become ripe any earlier than until after the adjudication of the petitioner's first petition or motion\ is not barred as a \second or successive\ motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).