Skip to main content
· 7/27/2012

United States v. Andre L. Jones

Citations

  • 689 F.3d 696
  • 2012 WL 3055867
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 15525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Vagueness challenges are normally evaluated in light of the particular facts of the case, not in general.”
  • “Vagueness challenges are normally evaluated in light of the particular facts of the case, not in general.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.