Buchmeier v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the civil rights lost were restored and where the right to serve on a jury was retained, the defendant’s civil rights were sufficiently restored
• holding that an Illinois‐state‐law conviction for which the defendant’s rights have been restored cannot be counted as a prior violent felony for purposes of the ACCA
• holding that an Illinois‐state‐law conviction for which the defendant’s rights have been restored cannot be counted as a prior violent felony for purposes of the ACCA
• holding that, where the civil rights lost were restored and where the right to serve on a jury was retained, the defendant’s civil rights were sufficiently restored
• holding that, where the civil rights lost were restored and where the right to serve on a jury was retained, the defendant’s civil rights were sufficiently restored
• concluding, post -Logan, that where defendant had rights to vote and hold office restored, while right to serve on a jury was never suspended, his civil rights had been restored under § 921(a)(20)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).