Skip to main content
· 10/24/2000

Tommy L. Rutledge v. United States

Citations

  • 230 F.3d 1041
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26786
  • 2000 WL 1582768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mailbox rule is not available to a petitioner represented by counsel
  • “[T]he Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar reinstatement of a conviction on a charge for which a jury returned a guilty verdict.” (citation omitted)
  • “Until a final ruling has been issued, a district court must consider a petitioner’s request to amend his § 2255 motion, though the court need not grant the requested amendments.” (citing Johnson v. United States, 196 F.3d 802, 805–06 (7th Cir. 1999)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.