Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 792 A.2d 368
  • 143 Md. App. 97
  • 2002 Md. App. LEXIS 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the conduct of the trial “must of necessity rest largely in the control and discretion of the presiding judge”
  • \The accused claiming the right of self-defense must not have been the aggressor or provoked the conflict.\
  • “Generally, evidence is relevant and admissible if it tends either to establish or disprove issues in the case.” (citing Snyder v. State, 361 Md. 580, 591, 762 A.2d 125 (2000))
  • “Significantly, appellant never expressed fear for his own safety, nor did he claim, even implicitly that his conduct occurred in a fit of anger or resulted from provocation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander, Eyler, James R., and Sonner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.