Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 599 So. 2d 158
  • 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where an objection was made and trial court’s ruling was treated as conclusive by state and defense counsel, there was no need for further objections when evidence was presented to jury
  • standing for the proposition that collateral crime evidence is not admissible to establish opportunity or common scheme unless either is a disputed issue at trial
  • “Whether a relevant material fact is in issue is not necessarily established by the defendant’s plea of not guilty (which denies each essential element of the charged offense
  • where evidence of appellant's sexual battery of another child 12 years previously was a significant part of the state's case against appellant and was inadmissible as similar fact evidence, the error in admitting that evidence could not be considered harmless
  • “If there is no bona fide dispute over a material fact that the similar fact evidence is offered to prove, then the probative value of such evidence necessarily has significantly less importance than its prejudicial effect, and the evidence should be excluded.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zehmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.